<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.00">
<channel>
<title> OpticDistraction Photoblog</title>
<link> http://www.opticdistraction.com/photoblog </link>
<description>Recent entries from the OpticDistraction Photoblog</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<webMaster>justin@opticdistraction.com (Justin Gallagher)</webMaster>
<copyright>Copyright Tully Rohrer and Justin Gallagher, 2005-2006</copyright>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:50:55 -0700</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Angles</title>
<guid>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-03-07&amp;c=1068#info</guid>
<link>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-03-07&amp;c=1068#info</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Image: Angles
On: 2007-03-07 09:46:51 Thom said: 
The lens baby effect makes me feel like it&amp;#8217;s a macro shot with a short DOF, which goes perfectly with the plain building, which in turn makes me think this is a tiny building in a model city.  You playing with legos or somethin&amp;#8217; over there, Justin?

]]>
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:46:51 -0800</pubDate>
<author>justin@opticdistraction.com (Justin)</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angles</title>
<guid>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-03-07&amp;c=1066#info</guid>
<link>http://www.opticdistraction.com/index.php?d=2007-03-07&amp;c=1066#info</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[
Image: Angles
On: 2007-03-07 06:48:27 craiger said: 
I agree cool effect!

]]>
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:48:27 -0800</pubDate>
<author>justin@opticdistraction.com (Justin)</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>